Peter Lynch (Wikipedia) one of the most enviable fund manager of all time written in his Book “One Up on Wall Street” that we should buy a house before we invest our money into the stock market.
Do I own a house? Lynch suggests that you buy a house before you invest your money in the stock market because, "in 99 cases out of 100, a house will be a money-maker."
Is this True?
The way he sees it, a house is rigged in your favour. You can acquire one for 20% down (without having to make the cash call like you would with a stock bought on margin), the leverage you use increases your returns, and the interest on the loan is tax deductible.
In addition, people generally do more research when they buy a home than when they buy a stock, which further increases the chances that the investment will turn out well.
One of the most successful fund managers of all time, advocating public to invest in a house taking advantage of leverage before investing in a stock?
Let us see why.
Property better than Stocks? It depends
Peter Lynch said that when people look at a house, they're very careful. They look at the school system. They look at the street. They look at the plumbing. When they buy a refrigerator, they do homework.
But when it comes to stock people are so convinced that the small investor has no chance, the stock market's a big game and then they act accordingly to the masses. "they'll put $10,000 in some zany stock that they don't even know what it does that they heard on a bus on the way to work and wonder why they lose money, and they do it before sunset."
A DTZ research showed that property prices have outpaced equities between in the last 5 years. (Q3 2009 to Q3 2014). Using compound annual growth rate basis, property price increased 6.1% Vs STI’s growth of 4.2%
Does that really mean that property is better than shares?
An article from Motley Fool also addressed this topic. Read “Are Properties Really Better Investments Than Shares?”
Hmmm…. Or probably it is a function of how much effort or hours you put into research?
Renting beats buying a home? It depends
Read an article from Business Times earlier titled “Renting beats buying a home? It depends”
It reported that in USA, a study said that home ownership is still 38% cheaper than renting. In Australia, another study said that home prices are unlikely to keep growing at a rate they had from the past 60 years. A research found that if prices stay constant or appreciate 2% or less over the next 4-5 years, renting could prove more cost-effective than buying a property. Below is the example
Renting is More Feasible According to a Research?
Example – Purchase. Assume below:
- Condo unit purchased at ~ S$1.28 million near upper Bukit Timah area.
- Sell 4 years later
- Price appreciation less than 2%.
- Fixed interest 2.18% for next 4 years over 30 years.
- No inflation and no discount rate.
- 2 year holding period in the loan
- Minimum required down payment plus other miscellaneous fees all paid.
Overall a Loss of S$149,000/- conducted by a research company.
Example – Rental. Assume below:
- Rental S$2,800 per month
- Rental for 4 years
Hence according to this research, renting is more feasible over 4 years. However if property appreciate more than 2%, then the reverse may be true instead.
Not Just Profit and Loss
R’ST Research director said owning a property goes beyond profit and loss, but also personal and psychological factors. For instance, pride of owning a property and also owners do build up equity as they pay down the mortgage.
Financial security such as regular income had to be taken into account also. Also consider maintenance fees of property over time (wear and tear), condo monthly fees, property tax, hassle of finding tenants, and troubles you will encounter with troublesome tenants.
Why Buying Over Rental
“If Singaporeans buy a flat or private property, they will surely enjoy capital appreciation in the long term.” Ong Kah Seng, R’ST Research Director.
Mr. Ong also mentioned that rental money essentially goes to nowhere, merely helping landlord to pay off the mortgage, nor yielding one any returns. Singapore housing policies such as CPF are also inclining towards home ownership instead of rental. The absent of Capital gains tax in Singapore also encourage foreigners to invest their cash in property here.
Property or Stocks? Ask yourself which is better for you? Which one interests you more to perform hours of research? Which investment class makes you can sleep better?
Personally I will like to agree with Peter Lynch that invests in a house over your head to stay first. Do not rent a house to stay if you intend to be in the country for long.
Additional real estate investments then are just like stock investments. It requires hours spend in research until you become adept in it, before you unleash your buy call.
I also cannot agree more that Property and Shares are two different asset classes. They are different and you cannot really proclaim that one is better than another.
I currently invest in both asset classes to diversify my portfolio. This can provides me with different streams of income. Do remember that before you invest, you require building up your warchest of money. This requires years of regular savings as well as immense efforts in career/business to increase your earnings.
Remember that Warren Buffett work many jobs as a teenager and also started a “Pin Ball” business” to increase his earnings, save and invest.
So next time, when you hear a friend saying that “Property is better than Stocks” or “Stocks is better than Property”, there is no need to be agitated and start arguing against it. Just have to remember that both asset classes are different and both require hours of research before you reap your rewards.